Advertisement
Greg Fyn
User
Karma: 1  
Follow up on new Toys - 2008/08/21 20:55 I promised I'd post some pics of my re-designed server farm.... We went with a blade server and consume less than 1/3 of the power we used to when we had 5 big boxes..... I don't know if this link will work from my myspace page....but there is a first time for everything..... http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=232106961&albumID=1253169&imageID=16555715
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Jason Willey
User
Karma: 0  
Re:Follow up on new Toys - 2008/08/22 12:10 love the dice Check out my blog at: http://virtuallycrazy.blogspot.com
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Greg Fyn
User
Karma: 1  
Re:Follow up on new Toys - 2008/08/22 19:27 I enjoyed reading some of your blog....have you had a chance to play with Hyper-V very much? As a rookie with VMs I'm curious as to what you might think on how they stack up against each other.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Jason Willey
User
Karma: 0  
Re:Follow up on new Toys - 2008/08/22 20:42 I've watched the free training on Hyper-V that Microsoft made available, and had some discussions with Microsoft, but I have yet to actually load it.

Here's my impressions from the training and discussions I've had:

I think that it won't touch Vmware ESX in the enterprise space where high availibility is essential, until they work out their own version of VMotion. Their quick migration is good, but it's tough to stack up against VMotion for sensitive applications. With Vmotion, we tend to lose no more than one ping on a migration from one host to another.

Where I am taking a serious look at Hyper-V is for things that won't fit in our ESX environment. For example - we have one server that I can't migrate to our ESX environment because it has a hardcoded IP address in the application, and that subnet doesn't exist on the switches connected to our ESX servers. It is also a 6 year old server. So Hyper-V would be perfect for this, because I could put it on low end available server and the licensing cost and aggravation to my network team would be minimal. I was considering ESX3i for the same thing now that it's free, and then noticed that the ESX3i Hypervisor is extremely limited when it comes to what hardware it will run under.

now on the other side.. I've seen one thing on the Hyper-V side that I hadn't seen on the VMware side that I find very interesting, and that is dynamic processor allocation. Currently in Vmware ESX 3.5 the only thing I can add or change on a running virtual machine are new disks or what subnet the network adapter is pointed. In Hyper-V on 2008 it appears that the only thing you can't change on the fly is the amount of memory reserved for the VM. Hyper-V also seems to run on a much wider variety of hardware.

Thanks for reading my blog - I really enjoy doing it.

oh and the link if you want to do the MS free training on Hyper-V is :
https://www.microsoftelearning.com/eLearning/courseDetail.aspx?courseId=95556

I thought it was really well done, especially considering the price. A bit dry though when compared to the episode 65 here.
Check out my blog at: http://virtuallycrazy.blogspot.com
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Joomla Templates by Joomlashack
Joomla Templates and Joomla Tutorial